Legal Opinion

State v. Christie

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 1988No. 12438; DISTRICT COURT NO. T87-645PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

TANAKA, J.

In a driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor (DUI) 1 case, the State of Hawaii (State) appeals the district court’s order suppressing the results of the breath test administered to defendant Steven Richard Christie (Defendant). The basis of the suppression order was the court’s holding that the accuracy verification test performed at the time Defendant was administered the breath test was not in strict compliance with the pertinent provisions of Chapter 111 of Title 11 of the Administrative Rules of the State Department of Health. 2 We hold that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Camara v. AgsaludHawaii Supreme Court · 1984
  2. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1357 v. Hawaiian Telephone Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Mahiai v. SuwaHawaii Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. DavisHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. SouzaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. NesmithHawaii Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. MezurashiHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. ChristieHawaii Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. YoungHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. State v. WetzelHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API