Legal Opinion
State v. Wetzel
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
Decided December 11, 1989No. 13339; D.C. NO. T86-15154PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
TANAKA, J.
In a bench trial, defendant Gary David Wetzel (Defendant) was convicted of the offense of driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor (DUI) under Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 291-4(a)(2) (1985). On appeal, he seeks reversal of his conviction arguing that (1) the blood test result was improperly admitted into evidence because the State of Hawaii (State) failed to show strict compliance with § 11-11 l-5(e) of the State Department of Heálth’s Rules for the Testing of Blood, Breath and Other Bodily Substances for Alcohol Concentration (Rules), and (2)…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. TischioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- State v. GrindlesHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
- Davis v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1989
- Doyle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1981
- State v. KnollIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. NesmithHawaii Supreme Court · 2012
- Haas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- State v. BaldwinNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. YoungHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1990
- State v. LusiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.