Legal Opinion

prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 12,304 Eileen Gagnon v. G.D. Searle & Company

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided November 15, 1989No. 89-1453PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLOYD R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Eileen Gagnon brought this diversity suit against G.D. Searle & Company alleging that she sustained injuries from her use of the Cu-7, an intrauterine contraceptive device designed, manufactured, and sold by G.D. Searle. The district court granted G.D. Searle’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that Gagnon’s claim was time-barred under New Hampshire law. We affirm.

I

The relevant facts in this case are undisputed. Ms. Gagnon had a Cu-7 inserted in November 1978 at a family planning clinic in New Hampshire. She was advised verbally and in a written…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Carson v. MaurerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  2. Raymond v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  3. Brown v. Mary Hitchcock Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  4. Shillady v. Elliot Community HospitalSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  5. Rowe v. John DeereSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Nicolo v. Philip Morris, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  2. University System of New Hampshire v. United States Gypsum Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1991
  3. Lockheed Martin Corp. v. RFI Supply, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  4. prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,816 Carol Stewart Kemp v. G.D. Searle & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  5. Karen Ann Klempka v. G.D. Searle and Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API