Legal Opinion
Karen Ann Klempka v. G.D. Searle and Company, a Delaware Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 28, 1992No. 91-2775PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANSEN, Circuit Judge.
Karen Ann Klempka appeals from the order of the district court 1 granting summary judgment in favor of appellee G.D. Searle and Company (Searle) on the basis that Klempka’s products liability claim was time-barred under Minnesota law. Klemp-ka argues that the district court erred in holding that her pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) started the statute of limitations to run. We affirm.
I. FACTS
The facts of this case are fully developed in the district court’s opinion and we see no value in restating them in detail. See Klempka v. G.D. Searle and Co., 769 F.Supp. 1061…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Linda Miller and Barry Miller v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Hildebrandt v. Allied Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Continental Grain Company v. Fegles Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Adkison v. G.D. Searle & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Mukamal v. General Electric Capital Corp. (In re Palm Beach Finance Partners, L.P.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2013
- MacKereth v. GD Searle and Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
- Block v. Toyota Motor Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Medalen v. Tiger Drylac U.S.A., Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.