Legal Opinion

Chute v. Wisconsin Chemical Co.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided January 23, 1911PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Equity. Suit by Harry O. Chute against the Wisconsin Chemical Company. On motion by defendant to dismiss.

1Opinion of the Court

QUARLES, District Judge (after stating the facts as above).

This application is based upon a familiar equitable maxim, that “he who enters a court of equity must come with clean hands.” The first question presented is whether this maxim is available, under the facts stated, to close the door of the court to the complainant.

Equity is supposed to guard the portals of her jurisdiction jealously. No cause of action will be proceeded with which has become infected with fraud or other iniquity, it matters not when or how the facts are brought to the attention of the court. The distinction is,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Indiana Mfg. Co. v. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1907
  2. Siemens-Halske Electric Co. v. Duncan Electric Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1905
  3. Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. v. ClunieU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1898
  4. Comptograph Co. v. Burroughs Adding Mach. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1909
  5. Primeau v. GranfieldU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1910

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McKee v. FieldsOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Fickett-Brown Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  3. Flannery v. Flannery Bolt Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  4. Maas v. Maas' Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952
  5. United Kingdom Optical Co. v. American Optical Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API