Legal Opinion

Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. v. Clunie

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California

Decided June 27, 1898No. Nos. 12,557, 12,563, 12,564, 12,566, and 12,567PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Circuit Judge.

Five bills in equity have been filed by 62 fire insurance companies, doing business in the state of California, against Andrew J. Clnnie, insurance commissioner of the state of California, to restrain him from doing certain acts which, it is alleged, will cause the complainants irreparable injury. In bill No. 12,557 the complainants are 34 foreign corporations, viz. 21' incorporated under the laws of Great Britain and Ireland, 2 under the laws of the dominion of Canada, 7 under the laws of the empire of Germany, 2 under the laws of the republic of Switzerland, 1 under…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. United States v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Forsyth v. HammondSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Scott v. DonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Macon & Birmingham Railroad v. GibsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Kirby v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  2. Carpenter v. Southern Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. International Organization v. Red Jacket Consol. Coal &. Coke Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
  4. Delaware, L. & W. R. v. FrankU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York · 1901
  5. Camors-McConnell Co. v. McConnellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Alabama · 1905

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API