Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Fickett-Brown Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided February 8, 1944No. 10833PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
The order of the Board, which this proceeding is brought to enforce, was entered after a hearing had been had and an intermediate report filed in accordance with a stipulation that the order should be entered. The respondent opposes the entry of an enforcement decree, not on objections 1 urged before the Board — none were made there — but for reasons wholly collateral to, and without bearing on the entry of a decree. As set out in respondent’s answer, these reasons are (1) that the respondent has not violated, and does not intend to violate, the Board’s order; (2)…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- National Labor Relations Board v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Marshall Field & Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Dunscombe v. Amfot Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- National Labor Relations Board v. J. L. Hudson Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Mexia Textile Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Mitchell Brothers Film Group and Jartech, Inc. v. Cinema Adult Theater, A/K/A Cinema 69Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Albert E. Kuehnert v. Texstar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Petro Franchise Systems, LLC v. All American Properties, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2009
- Walt Peabody Advertising Service, Inc. v. PecoraDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.