Maas v. Maas' Adm'r
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
WADDILL, Commissioner.
The appellant, John C. Maas, brought this action in the Chancery Branch of the Jefferson Circuit Court under Section 639 a-1 et seq. of the Civil Code of Practice for a declaration of rights concerning title to certain property known as Tucker’s Lake. Appellant claims that a certain instrument dated February 11, 1941, was a mortgage, while appellee maintains it was a deed. The Chancellor heard proof on this issue but held that appellant was barred from re-liéf in equity by reason'of unconscionable conduct amounting to “unclean hands.”
The first question to be decided is…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Shaver v. Heller & Merz Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Barnes v. BarnesIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
- American Ins. Co. v. ScheuflerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Dunscombe v. Amfot Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. v. ClunieU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1898
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Godley v. Kentucky Resources Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Boling v. Prospect Funding Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2018
- Robinson v. American Broadcasting CompaniesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1970
- M. R. Godley v. Kentucky Resources Corporation, M. R. Godley v. Piedmont Land Sales, Inc., Hugh N. Rakes, J. E. Berry, Kentucky Resources Corporation, Clinton Coal Company and W. H. Goff, M. R. Godley v. Piedmont Land Sales, Inc., Hugh Rakes and Clinton Coal Company, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Memorial Hall Museum, Inc. v. CunninghamDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020