Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State of Oregon v. CERRUTI

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1950PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, C. J.

The state of Oregon, through its State Highway Commission, commenced this proceeding in eminent domain for the purpose of acquiring 2.47 acres of agricultural land (being a portion of a larger tract comprising about forty-four acres) owned by the defendants, M. A. and Rose M. Cerruti, and against which the defendants, Joseph J. and Mabel F. Fisher, hold a mortgage. The land lies west of Troutdale in Multnomah County, and the parcel to be taken will form a part of the New Columbia River Highway.

The state offered the owners $3,000.00 as just compensation for the land taken. The jury returned a…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. San Diego Land & Town Co. v. NealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Wassenich v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  3. City & County of Denver v. QuickSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  4. Central Georgia Power Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  5. Reisert v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1903

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission v. Superbilt Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. State Highway Commission v. BaileyOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. State Highway Commission v. Fisch-Or, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State Highway Commission v. StumboOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Herndon v. Housing Authority of City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API