Parlane Sportswear Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SPECTOR, Judge:
The original petition herein alleged a taking without just compensation in violation of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution. More than 2 years later an amended petition was filed alleging breach of an implied-in-fact contract. Plaintiffs have previously pursued two unsuccessful efforts to secure relief in the U.S. District Court on the same facts but different theories. The case is now before this court on cross-motions for summary judgment.
Statement of Facts
From 1959 to 1973 plaintiffs (a corporation and its president) operated a women’s clothing…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Porter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Putnam Mills Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Jackson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
- Yosemite Park & Curry Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Heydt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Parlane Sportswear Co., Inc. v. u.s.parlane Sportswear CCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983