Legal Opinion
Yosemite Park & Curry Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided July 14, 1978No. 375-75PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKunzig, Judge
Although we agree with the defendant that a *363contract with terms such as the express written contract entered into by Yosemite Park and Curry Company (YPC or plaintiff) and the National Park Service (NPS) is rendered invalid as not in accordance with applicable Government procurement statutes and regulations, we conclude that plaintiff did perform and defendant did knowingly receive the benefit of certain bargained-for and agreed-upon services and that plaintiff is, therefore, entitled to recover in quantum meruit the reasonable value of the servies rendered. Because a determination of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- G. L. Christian and Associates v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Whiteside v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Porter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Total Medical Management, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- The United States v. Amdahl CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Urban Data Systems, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Jordan Pond Company, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- S.J. Amoroso Construction Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.