Legal Opinion
Putnam Mills Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided June 20, 1973No. 357-70PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBennett, Judge
The plaintiff now before the court, 'Putnam Mills Corporation (Putnam), seeks to recover $14,480.22 from the United States, alleging that it has either 'an express or an implied contract with the defendant through its 'agent, the Small Business Administration1 (SB A), as guarantor or escrow promisor of amounts due Putnam as a subcontractor-supplier of the Sorensen Manufacturing Company (Sorensen). Putnam seeks the cost of goods delivered to Sorensen for which Putnam has never received payment from either Sorensen or the United States. For reasons to be detailed, the court holds that, even if…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Ellis Campbell, Jr., District Director of Internal Revenue v. J. M. Eastland and Montez EastlandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Algonac Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Housing Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- The United States v. Johnson Controls, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Erickson Air Crane Company of Washington, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Russell Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Porter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Urban Data Systems, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.