Commonwealth v. Belak
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice NIGRO.
Appellee/Cross-Appellant George Belak was convicted of burglary and other related offenses. Given that he had previously been convicted of burglary at least twice, Belak was subsequently sentenced, pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 9714, to the mandatory minimum of twenty-five years’ imprisonment and the mandatory maximum of fifty years’ imprisonment.1 On *417appeal, the Superior Court initially affirmed Belak’s judgment of sentence, rejecting Belak’s claims that his trial counsel had been ineffective2 and that section 9714 is unconstitutional because it places the burden on the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. FahySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. BomarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WatsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. O'BidosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. AponteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.