Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Aponte

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 19, 2004No. 21 EAP 2002PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice EAKIN.

We granted allowance of appeal to determine whether 35 P.S. § 780-115(a), which doubles the statutory maximum penalty upon proof of a prior conviction for a similar offense, without requiring proof beyond a reasonable doubt before a jury, violates due process under the Pennsylvania and United States Constitutions. We conclude § 780-115(a)’s sentencing enhancement is constitutionally valid, and affirm.

After willfully absenting himself from trial, appellant was tried in absentia before a jury which convicted him of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Mason, L., ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Commonwealth v. ShugarsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Commonwealth v. WatleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Wolfe, M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Commonwealth v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API