Commonwealth v. Aponte
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice EAKIN.
We granted allowance of appeal to determine whether 35 P.S. § 780-115(a), which doubles the statutory maximum penalty upon proof of a prior conviction for a similar offense, without requiring proof beyond a reasonable doubt before a jury, violates due process under the Pennsylvania and United States Constitutions. We conclude § 780-115(a)’s sentencing enhancement is constitutionally valid, and affirm.
After willfully absenting himself from trial, appellant was tried in absentia before a jury which convicted him of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Mason, L., ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. ShugarsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. WatleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Wolfe, M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.