Legal Opinion
Wooster v. Department of Fish & Game
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 26, 2012No. C068816PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1023Opinion
ROBIE, J.
In this quiet title action, plaintiff Kelly C. Wooster sought to establish that property he owns in Calaveras County is free and clear of a conservation easement recorded on the property over 30 years ago either because the Department of Fish and Game (the department) failed to post no hunting and no trespassing signs on the property as required by the conservation easement deed and agreement or because the grant of hunting rights to the department was void from the outset. The trial court sustained the department’s demurrer without leave to amend and dismissed the action.
On…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- City of Manhattan Beach v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Firth v. MarovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Lavely v. NonemakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Hawley v. KafitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Warner v. Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Canyon Vineyard Estates I v. DeJoriaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Lynch v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014