Legal Opinion
Warner v. Public Employees' Retirement System
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 17, 2015No. E060337PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOLLENHORST, Acting P. J.
This appeal turns on a matter of first impression, a question of statutory interpretation regarding the Judges’ Retirement System II Law (JRS II) (Gov. Code, 1 § 75500 et seq.), which establishes the system providing retirement benefits to California judges first elected or appointed to judicial office on or after November 9, 1994. Plaintiff and appellant Christopher J. Warner (Judge Warner) contends that under JRS II he is entitled to receive both a disability retirement allowance and payment of the monetary credits he accrued during his service. Defendant and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Day v. City of FontanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Crumpler v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GaramendiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Ventura County Deputy Sheriffs' Ass'n v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Bonnell v. Medical Bd. of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McGlynn v. State, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- McGlynn v. State of Calif.California Court of Appeal · 2018
- Wilmot v. Contra Costa County Employee's Retirement AssociationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021