Legal Opinion
Doe v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 29, 2006No. 06-544CPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL ORDER
BRADEN, Judge.
I. RELEVANT FACTS1
On November 28, 2001, Plaintiff was convicted in North Dakota of gross sexual imposition. See Am. Compl. at 2; see also N.D. Cent. Code § 12.1-20-03 (defining the elements and penalties for gross sexual imposition).
The DNA Identification Act of 1994, 42 U.S.C. § 14131 et seq. (“Act”), authorizes the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) to establish and maintain the National DNA Identification System (“NDIS”). See 42 U.S.C. § 14132(a) (authorizing the FBI Director to establish an index of DNA identification…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hernandez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Waltner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Khalil v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Larson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Moore v. Durango JailUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.