Legal Opinion

Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Diehl

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1885PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from Riley District Court. ACTION by Diehl against The Railway Company, to recover damages for bodily injuries. Trial at the September Term, 1883, and judgment for plaintiff for $8,000. The defendant brings the case to this court. The material facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

This was an action brought in the district court of Riley county, by George W. Diehl against the Union Pacific Railway Company, for the recovery of damages sustained by him while traveling as a passenger on one of the defendant’s trains. The damages were alleged to have been caused by the negligent conduct of the defendant in moving its train after it had been stopped at Brookville, on the evening of September 14, 1881, to enable the passengers to leave the. train to procure supper. The particular negligence originally specified in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  2. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. DycheSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  3. H. J. Seip & Co. v. PatrieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ten Cate v. SharpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  2. State v. PlumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  3. Goldfield Mohawk Mining Co v. Frances-Mohawk Mining & Leasing Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Kansas Wheat Growers Ass'n v. RinkelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  5. Wible v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API