Legal Opinion

Kansas Wheat Growers Ass'n v. Rinkel

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 3, 1928No. 28,269PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

This is an appeal from an order setting aside a verdict and one of the findings of fact returned by a jury and granting a new trial. The action is one to recover twenty-five cents a bushel damages provided for in a wheat growers’ contract entered *734into under sections 17-1601 to 17-1625, inclusive, of the Revised Statutes.

The evidence was submitted to a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of the defendant and answered special questions as follows:

“1. Do you find that the defendant was induced to sign the contract with the plaintiff by…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. KunkelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  2. Kansas City, Wyandotte & Northwestern Railroad v. RyanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  4. Yard v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  5. Butler v. MilnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nicholas v. LathamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  2. Posey v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. Walker v. Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  4. Tritle v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  5. Collett v. Estate of SchnellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API