Legal Opinion

H. J. Seip & Co. v. Patrie

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1877PublishedCited by 1 opinion

P/rror from Washington District Court. Replevin, brought by Seip and two others, as partners, against Patrie, sheriff, etc., to recover sixty tons of stone-coal. Plaintiffs claimed as owners. The sheriff justified his taking under an execution issued to him in favor of one Carpenter against the goods and chattels of the St. Jos. & D. C. Railroad Company, and he alleged that the property belonged to said railroad company.

Read the full summary

P/rror from Washington District Court. Replevin, brought by Seip and two others, as partners, against Patrie, sheriff, etc., to recover sixty tons of stone-coal. Plaintiffs claimed as owners. The sheriff justified his taking under an execution issued to him in favor of one Carpenter against the goods and chattels of the St. Jos. & D. C. Railroad Company, and he alleged that the property belonged to said railroad company. Trial at the November Term 1875. Verdict and judgment for the defendant, and Seip & Co. bring the case here.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

This was an action brought by H. J. Seip & Co. against Martin Patrie, to recover the possession of certain stone-coal. The only grounds upon ’which the plaintiffs ask a reversal of the judgment below are, that the verdict upon which such judgment was rendered is against the evidence, and that, for that reason, the court below erred *14in refusing to set aside such verdict, and in refusing to grant a new trial. There is no claim that the court below erred in any ruling prior to overruling the plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial; and from…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. DiehlSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API