Legal Opinion

Butler v. Rolling Hill Hospital

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 7, 1989No. 405PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROWLEY, Judge:

This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of appellee, Maria Limberakis, D.O., (Dr. Limberakis) and against appellant, Sylvia A. Butler, in a medical malpractice action. We affirm.

The relevant facts as stated by the trial court are as follows:

Plaintiff Sylvia Butler went to see [Dr. Limberakis], her family physician, in November of 1983 and complained of swelling in her breasts, an empty feeling and weight gain. [Dr. Limberakis] did not order a pregnancy test as requested by Plaintiff nor did she order one when Plaintiff requested it again in January of 1984.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Krenzelak v. KrenzelakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Faust v. MessingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Matter of Adoption of Christopher P.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Bialczak v. MoniakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kepple v. Fairman Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. M.A. v. United StatesAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Edmonds v. Western Pennsylvania Hospital Radiology Associates of Western Pennsylvania P.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Petition of City of ClairtonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Butler v. Rolling Hill HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API