Smith v. Smith
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HESTER, Judge:
This is an appeal by an adjudicated incompetent from a final order. The trial court found appellant to be incompetent due to mental illness, making him liable to dissipate his assets and become the victim of designing persons. The trial court appointed a financial institution as guardian of appellant’s estate. We affirm.
On April 11, 1985, appellees, who are parents and siblings of appellant, filed an ex parte petition for a preliminary *198injunction in the Orphans’ Court Division of the Chester County Court of Common Pleas, requesting that appellant be restrained from transferring…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Myers EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Faust v. MessingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Bryden's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
- Refior CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Earnshaw AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kepple v. Fairman Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Butler v. Rolling Hill HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- In Re Estate of WoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- In re Estate of Boyce, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2014
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987