Legal Opinion

Faust v. Messinger

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 23, 1985No. 00057PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HESTER, Judge:

Appellant, a grandmother, has appealed from an order which denied her visitation rights with her grandson following his adoption. Said order also refused to reopen the proceeding which had resulted in his adoption by appellees. Her claims are based on: 1) the fact that the boy’s father killed his wife (the boy’s mother and the appellant’s daughter), 2) the allegedly intentional and malicious acts of appellees in withholding from her the child’s whereabouts as well as the pendency of the adoption proceeding, 3) the Custody and Grandparents Visitation Act [CGVA], 23 P.S. § 1001 et…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Cave's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Matter of Adoption of Christopher P.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Commonwealth ex rel. Dogole v. CherrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Ingram v. O'BANNONDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Hede v. GilstrapWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Kepple v. Fairman Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. C.G. v. J.H.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. In Re Adoption of HessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. C.G. v. J.H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API