M.A. v. United States
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRYNER, Justice.
I.INTRODUCTION
We accepted certification in this case to decide whether a cause of action exists under Alaska law for a physician’s negligent failure to diagnose a pregnancy and, if so, the scope of recovery allowed under that cause of action. We conclude that negligent failure to diagnose a pregnancy gives rise to a cause of action for medical malpractice and is compen-sable to the extent that damages are ordinarily allowable in medical malpractice cases, but that no recovery may be awarded for expenses of rearing a healthy child born as a result of the misdiagnosis.
II.…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Burgess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Jackson v. BumgardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Peter W. v. San Francisco Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Rieck v. Medical Protective Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Kallstrom v. United StatesAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Lynden Inc. v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. SandsnessAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
- P.G. v. State, Department of Health & Human Services, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.