Legal Opinion

M.A. v. United States

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1998No. S-7593PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Justice.

I.INTRODUCTION

We accepted certification in this case to decide whether a cause of action exists under Alaska law for a physician’s negligent failure to diagnose a pregnancy and, if so, the scope of recovery allowed under that cause of action. We conclude that negligent failure to diagnose a pregnancy gives rise to a cause of action for medical malpractice and is compen-sable to the extent that damages are ordinarily allowable in medical malpractice cases, but that no recovery may be awarded for expenses of rearing a healthy child born as a result of the misdiagnosis.

II.…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Burgess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Jackson v. BumgardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Peter W. v. San Francisco Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Rieck v. Medical Protective Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Kallstrom v. United StatesAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Lynden Inc. v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. SandsnessAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. P.G. v. State, Department of Health & Human Services, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API