Legal Opinion

Butler v. Rolling Hill Hospital

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 10, 1990No. 00491PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMILIA, Judge:

This is an appeal from a December 30, 1989 Order granting appellee/Rolling Hill Hospital’s motion for summary judgment. The relevant facts are appellant had a laparoscopic tubal ligation performed on November 19, 1981 for the purpose of preventing further pregnancies. Thereafter, appellant became pregnant and delivered a healthy, albeit unwanted, baby boy on May 8, 1984. Appellant instituted a cause of action against Rolling Hill Hospital and K. Niki Cole, M.D., for failure to properly perform a tubal ligation. The suit also alleged negligence on the part of Maria Limberakis,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Speck v. FinegoldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Mason v. Western Pennsylvania HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Hatter v. LandsbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Butler v. Rolling Hill HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Catlin v. HamburgSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Chaffee v. SeslarIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Bianchini v. N.K.D.S. Associates Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Chaffee v. SeslarIndiana Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API