Lincoln Securities Co. v. Poppe, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, C.
Defendant gave three promissory notes to O. J. Thorpe. He indorsed them to plaintiff, who sues to recover the amount due thereon.
The defense is usury, coupled with an allegation that plaintiff is not a bona fide purchaser for value and before maturity, and an allegation that there cannot be a full determination of the action unless Thorpe is brought in as a party.
After serving the answer, defendant obtained an ex parte order making Thorpe a party defendant. He failed to appear or answer. Subsequently plaintiff moved for the vacation of the order. The motion was granted and defendant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Clay County Land Co. v. AlcoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Security State Bank v. BrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Eimon Mercantile Co. v. CassidySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Lewis v. BabcockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Davis v. SuttonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Elsen v. State Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Lambertson v. WestermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Luethi v. StankoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.