Clay County Land Co. v. Alcox
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Clay county by Clay County Land Company to recover possession of its offices and the contents thereof'and to restrain defendant Henry C. Alcox from interfering therewith. On defendant’s motion Samuel A. Hoyt was by order, Baxter, J., made a party plaintiff and required to reply to defendant’s answer. The case was dismissed as to plaintiff and thereafter judgment by default was ordered in favor of defendant against Samuel A. Hoyt.
Read the full summary
Action in the district court for Clay county by Clay County Land Company to recover possession of its offices and the contents thereof'and to restrain defendant Henry C. Alcox from interfering therewith. On defendant’s motion Samuel A. Hoyt was by order, Baxter, J., made a party plaintiff and required to reply to defendant’s answer. The case was dismissed as to plaintiff and thereafter judgment by default was ordered in favor of defendant against Samuel A. Hoyt. From a judgment entered pursuant to the order, and from an order denying a motion to vacate the same, Samuel A. Hoyt appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
The Clay County Land Company is a domestic corporation having its principal place of business at Barnesville, in the county of Clay, with a branch office at Moorhead. On September 6, 1901, it commenced in the district court, county of Clay, an action against Henry C. Alcox, the respondent herein, for the restitution of its offices at Moorhead, and to restrain him from using them. The respondent four days thereafter served an answer in the cause upon the appellant herein, Samuel A. Hoyt, a resident of the county of Ramsey. The answer denied the allegations of the complaint, and alleged that…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Enid Oil & Pipe Line Co. v. ChamplinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- National Council of Knights & Ladies of Security v. WeislerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Banks v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961
- Ladd & Tilton Bank v. RosensteinWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- State ex rel. Ausdemore v. Catholic Welfare Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.