Legal Opinion

Davis v. Sutton

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 2, 1877PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Blue Earth county, Dickinson, J., presiding, denying their motion that one H. Davis be made a party to the action.

1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.

This action is brought to recover upon defendants’ promissory note, made payable to H. Davis, and alleged to have been sold and transferred to plaintiff after maturity, and also to recover a demand of $28.07 for services rendered by Daids to defendants, which is also alleged to have been transferred to plaintiff. Defendants’ answer admits the existence of the causes of action set up in the complaint. The answer also sets up a claim against Davis, accrued to defendants before the alleged transfers to plaintiff, and exceeding by several hundred dollars the amount claimed by plaintiff.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Guernsey v. CarverNew York Supreme Court · 1832
  2. Farrington v. PayneNew York Supreme Court · 1818
  3. Risley v. SquireNew York Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burnett v. TaylorWyoming Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Lincoln Securities Co. v. Poppe, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. Eimon Mercantile Co. v. CassidySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API