Eimon Mercantile Co. v. Cassidy
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for St. Louis county to recover $71,-902.43 converted by the brokerage firm of Cassidy & Munson. From the order, Dickinson, J., granting defendant’s motion that H. S. Juls-rud be made a party to the action, the Eimon Mercantile Company and H. S. Julsrud appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
On defendant’s motion the court ordered H. S. Julsrud to become a party to the'action and reply to defendant’s answer. Plaintiff and Julsrud appeal.
Plaintiff, assignee of Julsrud, sues to recover for an alleged con-' version of funds which the grain brokerage firm of Cassidy & Mun-son, of which defendant is now the sole surviving member, had accumulated for Julsrud in buying and selling grain, as his agents, prior to October 12, 1916. The assignment to plaintiff is alleged to have been made in 1920. Defendant’s answer denies the assignment and the existence of any claim in favor of Julsrud…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Clay County Land Co. v. AlcoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Crosby v. Scott-Graff Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Davis v. SuttonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
3Cited by4 opinions
- McClearn v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Lincoln Securities Co. v. Poppe, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Levstek v. National Surety Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Schau v. BussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940