Legal Opinion

Gift v. Ahrnke

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 20, 1951No. Civ. 14731PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (Fred B.), J.

Defendants Albert L. Hammill and Hans P. Ahrnke were partners engaged in the general security brokerage business under the name of Hammill and Company. Defendant American Bonding Company of Baltimore, a corporation, was surety on the bond of Hammill and Company as a broker licensed under the provisions of the Corporate Securities Act. Plaintiff May W. Gift was a customer of and maintained a securities account with Ham-mill and Company.

Judgment was rendered for plaintiff for $4,000 against Ahrnke, Hammill and the American Bonding Company, and for $13,547.66 against Ahrnke and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Proctor v. ArakelianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Harris v. SeidellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Vanciel v. KumleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Ross v. Prudential Guarantee Building & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Gardner v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Navrides v. Zurich InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Transport Clearings-Bay Area v. SimmondsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Crawford v. NastosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Friddle v. EpsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Wagner v. ShaponaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API