Legal Opinion

Vanciel v. Kumle

California Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1945No. Sac. 5671PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action to recover royalties from defendants Hubert and Donald Kumle, Leon Brier and Placer Properties Company, lessees, under the terms of a mining lease. To secure a loan of $25,000 plaintiffs assigned all royalties due or to become due from the lessees to the Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association. The loan was made by the Oakdale branch of the bank in conjunction with other mining operations in which both plaintiffs and defendants were interested. The bank was made a party defendant to the action. The lease provided that the lessees pay advance…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bogart v. George K. Porter Co.California Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Chapman v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Hunter v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Ralphs v. HenslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Iverson v. Metropolitan Life Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Culley v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Gift v. AhrnkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Murphy v. MunsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Durgin v. KaplanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API