Legal Opinion

Myers v. City of Toledo

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 2006No. Nos. 2005-1355 and 2005-1473PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

{¶ 1} This appeal requires us to answer the following question certified to us as a conflict: “Is a ruling which grants a Civ.R. 35(A) motion for a physical or mental examination made in a special proceeding such as a divorce case or worker’s [sic] compensation case, a final appealable order under either R.C. 2505.02(B)(2) or R.C. 2505.02(B)(4)?” We answer the question in the negative. An order granting a physical or medical examination, made in a special proceeding, is not a final, appealable order.

I

{¶ 2} Appellee, Kenneth Myers, was an employee of the city of Toledo, working as a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. BotsfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. State ex rel. Steckman v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. MuncieOhio Supreme Court · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. O'Toole v. DenihanOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Stammco, L.L.C. v. United Tel. Co. of OhioOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State ex rel. LetOhioVote.org v. BrunnerOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Felix v. Ganley Chevrolet, Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  5. In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API