Myers v. City of Toledo
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
{¶ 1} This appeal requires us to answer the following question certified to us as a conflict: “Is a ruling which grants a Civ.R. 35(A) motion for a physical or mental examination made in a special proceeding such as a divorce case or worker’s [sic] compensation case, a final appealable order under either R.C. 2505.02(B)(2) or R.C. 2505.02(B)(4)?” We answer the question in the negative. An order granting a physical or medical examination, made in a special proceeding, is not a final, appealable order.
I
{¶ 2} Appellee, Kenneth Myers, was an employee of the city of Toledo, working as a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. BotsfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- State ex rel. Steckman v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. MuncieOhio Supreme Court · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- O'Toole v. DenihanOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Stammco, L.L.C. v. United Tel. Co. of OhioOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- State ex rel. LetOhioVote.org v. BrunnerOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Felix v. Ganley Chevrolet, Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
- In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.