Legal Opinion
Felix v. Ganley Chevrolet, Inc. (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 27, 2015No. 2013-1746PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, C.J.
{¶ 1} In this appeal, we address whether all members of a plaintiff class alleging violations of the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act (“OCSPA”), R.C. Chapter 1345, must have suffered injuries as a result of the conduct challenged in the suit. We hold that they must and therefore reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.
Relevant Background
{¶ 2} This appeal arises from two related class-action lawsuits that were first brought by appellees, Jeffrey and Stacy Felix, nearly 15 years ago. In each suit, the Felixes sought damages from appellants, Ganley Chevrolet, Inc., and Ganley Management…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Max Gerboc v. ContextLogic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- In re Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Olentangy Commons Owner, L.L.C. v. FawleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- In re Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Co. Mktg. & Sales Practices & Prods. Liab. Litig.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
- Madyda v. Ohio Dept. of Pub. SafetyOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.