Legal Opinion

Sheridan v. Kurz

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1946No. Docket No. 8, Calendar No. 43,203PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

Plaintiffs own lots, on which they reside, in the McConnell addition to the city of Pontiac. Defendants Bussell G-. Kurz and wife live on lot 45 in this subdivision, their title having been acquired by deed from Adolph F. Netzel and wife on June 21, 1943. This subdivision was platted in 1898, and various recorded deeds since that date, including that of defendants, contain covenants restricting the use of the premises to “residence purposes only.” According to the testimony, this subdivision consists of 140 lots, and the only properties that have ever been used for other than residence…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boston-Edison Protective Ass'n v. GoodloveMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Polk Manor Co. v. MantonMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Voorheis v. PowellMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Boston-Edison Protective Ass'n v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Pink v. ElderMichigan Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bloomfield Estates Improvement Ass'n, Inc. v. City of BirminghamMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Bloomfield Estates Improvement Ass'n, Inc. v. City of BirminghamMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Bloomfield Estates Improvement Ass'n, Inc. v. City of BirminghamMichigan Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API