Legal Opinion

Voorheis v. Powell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1933No. Docket No. 115, Calendar No. 36,763PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Elmer;W. Voorheis, and the 25 other plaintiffs herein, are owners of residences fronting on. Collingwood avenue in G-reenlawn subdivision, being the southerly 682 feet of quarter section 25, 10,000-acre tract, in Detroit, Michigan. The portion of Collingwood avenue lying within the subdivision runs west from Woodward avenue to Hamilton boulevard, and is also traversed by Second and Third avenues, all important thoroughfares running north and south. The property of 13 of the plaintiffs is situated in the first block of the subdivision west of Woodward avenue, a choice residential district.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sanborn v. McLeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Evangelical Lutheran Church of Ascension v. SahlemNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Misch v. LehmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  4. De Galan v. BarakMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Oliver v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Guyton v. YanceySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
  2. Dooley v. Savannah Bank Trust CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  3. Polk Manor Co. v. MantonMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Taylor Avenue Improvement Ass'n v. Detroit Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Alamogordo Improvement Co. v. PrendergastNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API