Legal Opinion

Bloomfield Estates Improvement Ass'n, Inc. v. City of Birmingham

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 2007No. Docket 130990Published

1Opinion of the Court

737 N.W.2d 670 (2007)

BLOOMFIELD ESTATES IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

CITY OF BIRMINGHAM, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 130990. Calendar No. 1.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Argued April 10, 2007.

Decided July 18, 2007.

Kemp, Klein, Umphrey, Endelman & May, P.C. (by Raymond L. Morrow and Ronald S. Nixon), Troy, for the plaintiff.

Beier Howlett, P.C. (by Timothy J. Currier and Jeffrey S. Kragt), Bloomfield Hills, for the defendant.

MARKMAN, J.

We granted leave to appeal to consider: (1) whether the use of a park as a "dog park" violates a deed restriction limiting use of the land…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Civil Rights CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Rory v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Klapp v. United Insurance Group Agency, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Koontz v. Ameritech Services, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Henderson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API