Bloomfield Estates Improvement Ass'n, Inc. v. City of Birmingham
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentKelly, J.
This is a dispute over a dog park. Three years ago, defendant city of Birmingham fenced off one acre of property in a city park1 to allow dogs to run off-lead under the supervision of their owners. Plaintiff Bloomfield Estates Improvement Association, Inc., sued to block defendant from this use by seeking to enforce a deed restriction that limited portions of the park to residential purposes. A majority of this Court holds that using the lot as a dog park violates the deed restriction. It also holds that plaintiff can enforce the deed restriction even though plaintiff failed to object to use…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Isbrandtsen v. North Branch Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- Terrien v. ZwitMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Haynes v NeshewatMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re ChurchMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- Greene v. a P Products, LtdMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.