Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bloomfield Estates Improvement Ass'n, Inc. v. City of Birmingham

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 2007No. Docket 130990Published

1DissentKelly, J.

This is a dispute over a dog park. Three years ago, defendant city of Birmingham fenced off one acre of property in a city park1 to allow dogs to run off-lead under the supervision of their owners. Plaintiff Bloomfield Estates Improvement Association, Inc., sued to block defendant from this use by seeking to enforce a deed restriction that limited portions of the park to residential purposes. A majority of this Court holds that using the lot as a dog park violates the deed restriction. It also holds that plaintiff can enforce the deed restriction even though plaintiff failed to object to use…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Isbrandtsen v. North Branch Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  2. Terrien v. ZwitMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Haynes v NeshewatMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  4. In Re ChurchMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Greene v. a P Products, LtdMichigan Supreme Court · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API