Legal Opinion
State v. Holloway
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 1, 2018No. A16-1489PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LILLEHAUG, Justice.
*342Appellant Christopher Lee Holloway was charged with third- and fourth-degree criminal sexual conduct for engaging in sexual penetration and sexual contact with J.D., a 14-year-old boy. Before trial, Holloway brought a motion to declare Minnesota Statutes §§ 609.344, subd. 1(b), 609.345, subd. 1(b) (2016), unconstitutional. These provisions prohibit, respectively, sexual penetration and sexual conduct where "the complainant is at least 13 but less than 16 years of age and the actor is more than 24 months older than the complainant." Minn. Stat. § 609.344, subd. 1(b) ; Minn.…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fletcher Props., Inc. v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
- Chad Loran Siegel v. Drew EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2026
- Holloway v. MinnesotaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
- In re Defense and Indemnification of Alexander Vladimir BrownCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2025
- Rud v. JohnstonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023