Legal Opinion

Birken v. Hickey

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1920No. File Nos. 4517-4523PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lyman County. Hon. AViruaji AVii.riamson, -Judge. Separate actions 'brought by William J. Birlcin, Jr., against Ray AAC Hickey, Dirks Trust & Title Company, William R. Tapper, and Guy Kelley as administrator of the estate of Peter-B. Dirks, deceased (No. 4517)against Roy F.‘ Hickey et al. (No. 4518) ; against Phillip Kil-ber et al. (No. 4519) ; against Johann Nehlich et al. (No. 4520); against Valley Bend Land & Cattle Company et al.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lyman County. Hon. AViruaji AVii.riamson, -Judge. Separate actions 'brought by William J. Birlcin, Jr., against Ray AAC Hickey, Dirks Trust & Title Company, William R. Tapper, and Guy Kelley as administrator of the estate of Peter-B. Dirks, deceased (No. 4517)against Roy F.‘ Hickey et al. (No. 4518) ; against Phillip Kil-ber et al. (No. 4519) ; against Johann Nehlich et al. (No. 4520); against Valley Bend Land & Cattle Company et al. (No. 4521) ; against Floyd M. Wallace et al. (No. 4522); and against Adam Weisen-burger et al. (No. 4523). From separate judgments in…

1Opinion of the CourtWhiting, J.

One Peter B. Dirks was the managing officer of the Dirks- Trust & Title ‘Company, hereinafter denominated the Title Company, of .which corporation one AVilliam R. Tapper, a resident of Chicago, was also a stockholder. Among the enterprises in which Dirks wa,s engaged was the loaning- of money on notes secured by chattel mortgages on cattle and horses — such notes and mortgages being .commonly spoken of as “cattle paper.” His custom was- to take such paper, either in -his own name as payee or in that of the Title Company, and then sell *478same to loan, companies or capitalists. Among parties to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Owings v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  2. Cox v. DawsonWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Wyman v. WilmarthSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Finch v. ArmstrongSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Noyes v. LaneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Baird v. MeyerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Birken v. TapperSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Barbour v. FinkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Durham v. RascoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Wilson v. KirchanWashington Supreme Court · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API