Legal Opinion

Barbour v. Finke

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1924No. File No. 5643PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGates, J.

This was an action brought to foreclose a real estate mortgage dated January 11, 1915, securing a promissory note for $3,500 of even date due on or before 10 years after date, with interest at 6 per cent, per annum payable annually. In March, 1918, the'note was indorsed in blank by the payees and delivered to plaintiff, and the mortgage was assigned to plaintiff. The mortgage, but not the note, contained the usual acceleration clause, which provided that upon default in the payment of interest the holder might declare the whole sum due. Default in the payment of interest due January, 1921,…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. District of Columbia v. WoodburySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Chicago Railway Equipment Co. v. Merchants' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Chouteau v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  5. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of New Port Richey v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
  2. Schleuter Co., Inc. v. SevignySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Barbour v. FinkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  4. First Nat. Bank of Goodwin v. Marshall State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  5. Kalen v. GeldermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API