Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Kirchan

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1927No. 19972. En BancPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAskren, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover on a note for three thousand dollars, and interest, executed in his favor by the defendants. The note was not due by its terms at the time the suit was brought, but at the time of its execution the defendants had executed a mortgage as security therefor, which provided, among other things, that they would pay the taxes and assessments levied against the property, the interest as it became due, keep the buildings insured, and that :

“ ... in case any taxes shall become delinquent and remain unpaid, or such insurance shall not be procured or interest…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. PeckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  2. Owings v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  3. Swearingen v. LahnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  4. White v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  5. Winne v. LahartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. American Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Tacoma v. McCaffreyWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Robertson v. Club EphrataWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Metropolitan Mortgage & Securities Co. v. BeckerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  4. Poultrymen's Service Corp. v. BrownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  5. Central R. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API