Noyes v. Lane
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from the district court, Spink county. Motion to discharge an attachment. Allowed. Plaintiff appeals. Affirmed. By permission of the court and counsel this cause was submitted upon the briefs and arguments in the case of HornickDrug Co. v. Lane (post). The material facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtKellam, J.
This is an appeal from an order discharging an attachment. The case was submitted upon the briefs and arguments in Drug Co. v. Lane, (decided at this term.) In this case, as in that, the alleged fraudulent character of the chattel mortgage given by C. J. Lane to William A. Lane (considered in Lane v. Starr, also decided at this term) was relied upon as the main ground of attachment, or, rather, as the principal evidence in support of the allegations of the affidavit upon whihh the warrant of attachment was issued. That mortgage was held valid by this court, and the present inquiry is thus…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Birken v. HickeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
- Holland v. Bogardus-Hill Drug Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1926
- St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. MacGovern & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1923
- Noyes v. LaneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
- Farmers' & Merchants' State Bank v. DoeringSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928