Legal Opinion
Birken v. Tapper
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 30, 1922No. File No. 5056PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPolley, J.
This action grows out of the same transactions that are the basis of Birken v. Hickey et al, 42 S. D. 472, 176 N. W. 137. After that appeal plaintiff pursued such remedies as he had on the notes and mortgages. A small amount was collected on some of the notes and a dividend on each note was collected from the estate of Peter, B. Dirks. This action is brought against Tapper on the contract of guaranty or indemnity "that was executed by Tapper and Dirks to indemnify the McNish Company against any loss it might suffer on account of “cattle paper” purchased through the D'irks Trust & Title…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Backus v. FeeksWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Continental Supply Co. v. Tuckerrose Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
- International Textbook Co. v. MabbottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
- Birken v. HickeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
- Gates v. TebbettsNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- American Insurance Company v. First National Bank in St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
- Phelps v. DawsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- International Multifoods Corp. v. MardianSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Farmers & Traders Bank of Auxvasse v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
- Perry v. CohenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.