Legal Opinion

United States v. Carlin Communications, Inc. Carl Ruderman, Ira Kirschenbaum, Kevin Goodman, and Samantha Fox

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 9, 1987No. 85-2645, 85-2652 to 85-2655PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WESLEY E. BROWN, Senior District Judge.

A twenty-three count indictment filed in Salt Lake City on April 25, 1985, charged Carlin Communications, two of its officers, and one employee, and an actress, Samantha Fox, with various federal obscenity crimes in connection with the operation of a “dial it” telephone service whereby persons could call a New York City telephone number and listen to a sexually suggestive, pre-recorded message.

Upon motion by all defendants under Rule 12(b), the Indictment was dismissed in its entirety as to all defendants for the reason that it failed to charge any…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. Franklin D. LampleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  3. United States v. DarseyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Carlin Communications, Inc. And Drake Publishers, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  5. Paul Jensen and Ruby Jensen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert Alan Thomas (94-6648) and Carleen Thomas (94-6649)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  2. ApolloMedia Corp. v. RenoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1998
  3. Carlin Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  4. Carlin Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  5. ApolloMedia Corp. v. RenoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API