Legal Opinion

United States v. Robert Alan Thomas (94-6648) and Carleen Thomas (94-6649)

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 12, 1996No. 94-6648 and 94-6649PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDMUNDS, District Judge.

Defendants Robert and Carleen Thomas appeal their convictions and sentences for violating 18 U.S.C. §§ 1462 and 1465, federal obscenity laws, in connection with their oper ation of an electronic bulletin board. For the following reasons, we AFFIRM Robert and Carleen Thomas’ convictions and sentences.

I

Robert Thomas and his wife Carleen Thomas began operating the Amateur Action Computer Bulletin Board System (“AABBS”) from their home in Milpitas, California in February 1991. The AABBS was a computer bulletin board system that operated by using telephones, modems, and…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Compuserve, Incorporated v. Richard S. Patterson, Individually, and Flashpoint DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  3. United States v. RunyanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  4. Aleia L. Robinson v. Marvin T. Runyon, Postmaster General, United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. Daniel Zane MohrbacherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API