Legal Opinion
Carlin Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 15, 1988No. 87, Docket 87-4054PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OAKES, Circuit Judge:
The Federal Communications Commission (“Commission” or “FCC”) has once again issued regulations establishing a defense to prosecution under section 223(b) of the Federal Communications Commission Authorization Act of 1983, 47 U.S.C. § 223(b) (Supp. I 1983), which regulates interstate “dial-a-porn” services. The Commission adopted the Third Report and Order, Enforcement of Prohibitions Against the Use of Common Carriers for the Trans*549mission of Obscene Materials, FCC 87-143, 2 FCC Red 2714 (1987),1 in response to this court’s decisions in Carlin Communications, Inc. v. FCC,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Carlin Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988