Legal Opinion

ApolloMedia Corp. v. Reno

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 23, 1998No. C-97-346 MMCPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT

MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff ApolloMedia Corporation (“Apol-loMedia”) seeks to enjoin enforcement of portions of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (“CDA”) codified at 47 U.S.C. § 223(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 47 U.S.C. § 223(a)(2) on the grounds that the subject provisions, to the extent that they prohibit “indecent” communications made “with an intent to annoy,” are impermissibly overbroad and vague, and thus violate the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. ApolloMedia…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert EckhardtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. William M. LandhamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. TobinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  4. ApolloMedia Corp. v. RenoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API