Legal Opinion

Walt Medical v. Electro-Nucleonics

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 17, 1990No. 1712PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in not opening judgment of non pros for the appellee. We hold that the trial court abused its discretion, and reverse and remand.

The facts and procedural history can be summarized as follows. Ronald J. Lapko, t/d/b/a Walt Medical (appellant), had an agreement to sell medical equipment for Electro-Nucleonics, Inc. (appellee), in exchange for commission on those sales. There was a dispute regarding the amount of commission due. Walt Medical commenced an action against Electro-Nucleonics, Inc.. A Board of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Valley Peat & Humus v. Sunnylands, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Narducci v. Mason's Discount StoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Fortune/Forsythe v. FortuneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Wayne v. Pennsylvania National Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jones v. RudensteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Stock v. ArnottSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Abraham Zion Corp. v. After Six, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Haviland v. Kline & Specter, P.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Debroff v. CorrettiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API