Legal Opinion

Debroff v. Corretti

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 27, 1994No. 378PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROWLEY, President Judge:

Morton B. Debroff, Esquire, (hereinafter “appellant”), a pro se plaintiff in the trial court, appeals from an order dismissing his complaint against Alice and Pierre Corretti (hereinafter “appellees”) with prejudice 1 following the failure of all parties and their counsel to appear for the call of the list and trial of this matter before a Board of Judicial Arbitration. Appellant contends on appeal that the trial court erred by entering the subject order because he proffered a reasonable explanation for his failure to appear at the arbitration hearing.

The record…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Valley Peat & Humus v. Sunnylands, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Toczylowski v. General Bindery Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. McGonigle v. CurrenceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Nivens Ex Rel. Nivens v. Chestnut Hill HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Ttmar, Inc. v. SulkaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sahutsky v. H.H. Knoebel SonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Davis v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Brown v. D. & P. Willow Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Tauss v. GoldsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Brown, N. v. KML Law Group, P.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API