Debroff v. Corretti
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ROWLEY, President Judge:
Morton B. Debroff, Esquire, (hereinafter “appellant”), a pro se plaintiff in the trial court, appeals from an order dismissing his complaint against Alice and Pierre Corretti (hereinafter “appellees”) with prejudice 1 following the failure of all parties and their counsel to appear for the call of the list and trial of this matter before a Board of Judicial Arbitration. Appellant contends on appeal that the trial court erred by entering the subject order because he proffered a reasonable explanation for his failure to appear at the arbitration hearing.
The record…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Valley Peat & Humus v. Sunnylands, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Toczylowski v. General Bindery Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- McGonigle v. CurrenceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Nivens Ex Rel. Nivens v. Chestnut Hill HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Ttmar, Inc. v. SulkaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sahutsky v. H.H. Knoebel SonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Davis v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Brown v. D. & P. Willow Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Tauss v. GoldsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Brown, N. v. KML Law Group, P.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.