Legal Opinion

Jones v. Rudenstein

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 24, 1991No. 248PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

The instant case involves a pro se appeal from a judgment of non pros entered against a pro se litigant upon an attorney malpractice claim arising from appellant’s unsuccessful post-verdict challenge to prior counsel’s effectiveness in the trial which resulted in his conviction of first degree murder. We affirm.

As with many cases involving pro se litigants, the procedural history is obscure and confused, and the record contains gaping omissions. Nonetheless, we glean the following from the record here on appeal.

On October 15, 1987, appellant filed a complaint asserting claims for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Ibn-Sadiika v. RiesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Valley Peat & Humus v. Sunnylands, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Nivens Ex Rel. Nivens v. Chestnut Hill HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Walt Medical v. Electro-NucleonicsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Jiricko v. Geico InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Hoover v. DavilaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Com. v. Ray, T., Jr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Peters Creek Sanitary Authority v. WelchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Deek Investment, L.P. v. Murray, F.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API